About Us

Our work strives to enhance our sense of surroundings, identity and relationship to others and the physical spaces we inhabit, whether feral or human-made.

Selected Awards
  • 2004 — Aga Khan Award for Architecture
  • 2009 — Mies van der Rohe Award
  • 2013 — AIA/ALA Library Building Award
  • 2015 — Best Interior, Designers Saturday
  • 2016 — AIA New York Honor Award

Tinder declare a unique have. Bumble isn’t delighted. (a spokesperson for fit confirmed the component are accessible in 2018.)

Tinder declare a unique have. Bumble isn’t delighted. (a spokesperson for fit confirmed the component are accessible in 2018.)

The bitterness between Bumble and accommodate couldn’t publicly erupt until mid-February once marketplace Watch published a tale about an impending Tinder characteristic: people would will have a choice of just socializing regarding app with men the two pick.

The attribute appeared very comparable to Bumble’s enterprize model, in which female need to make the very first move.

“The time of the statement was not coincidental,” Bumble said into the complement. “Match’s announcement this wanted to replicate the primary attribute of Bumble and commence contending when you look at the space Bumble got developed ended up being determined to cool the investment market place.”

It had been a jolt to Bumble’s professionals, but not as opposed to affect of exactly what came then.

Accommodate sues Bumble, contacting they a ‘Tinder-clone.’

On March 16, accommodate team submitted a lawsuit against Bumble, proclaiming that Bumble have copied Tinder from the start: “Bumble looked to mimic Tinder’s operation, trade-off Tinder’s name, brand name, and basic feel, fulfill owner objectives that Tinder it self as well as its brand created, and create a business completely on a Tinder-clone, recognized simply by Bumble’s women-talk-first selling point,” it stated.

The claim covers many ground. Here are the important takeaways:

• fit people claims Bumble infringed on two patents it secured just the previous year — one that has to do with the way Tinder couples upward possible dates, plus one that pertains to the style of the software.

• fit contends that Bumble’s use of the phrase “swipe” infringes on Match’s trademark with the name.

• complement likewise promises that Mr. Gulczynski and Ms. Mick, Bumble people just who earlier proved helpful at Tinder, misappropriated swap ways people have discovered and handled as they are at fit collection.

Extremely Bumble sues accommodate, dialing it a bully.

Bumble retaliated by posting an open letter as an ad during the ny time in addition to the Dallas morning hours Stories.

“Dear fit people,” the page set out. “We swipe leftover on you. We all swipe lead on your own several tries to get united states, copy us all, and, today, to intimidate north america. We’ll never be yours. No matter the asking price, we’ll never compromise our very own worth.”

Ranking Bumble while the underdog, the page continuing: “We — a woman-founded, women-led business — aren’t frightened of hostile company culture. That’s everything we contact bullying, and now we swipe kept on bullies. Question the many customers we’ve hindered from your system for negative attitude.”

The connection for the Bumble’s boast of being a secure app for women got direct. “We aim everyday to safeguard our personal practically 30 million customers, and also engineer a much more responsible surroundings,” the page said. “Instead of moving back and forth between wanting pick us all, replicate people, and sue you, exactly why don’t spent that point taking good care of awful behaviors on your networks?”

Fit answered with a statement: ”The truth around this lawsuit are simple: a business cannot rob exchange methods and sensitive data nor infringe on patents without consequences. It’s our duty to guard the of our own employees, which we’re accomplishing, through legal actions against two independent companies.”

Mr. Diller grabbed a swipe of his very own at Bumble, declaring over these webpages that “Match.com has led to goodness knows the number of additional marriages than taverns actually has. And then I’m needs to hear that regarding Tinder. It’s interesting, though, https://datingperfect.net/dating-sites/cowboycowgirl-com-reviews-comparison/ on Bumble, women access choose initial and they dont should.”

Nevertheless, some experts learn Bumble’s page as a smart promotional move.

“Bumble enjoys adroitly tried to place this lawsuit as an intimidation move by a much bigger, well-versed company,” stated Wayne Pollock, the monitoring lawyers at Copo procedures, a legal solutions and connection firm. “It’s a standard David vs. Goliath.” Even though Bumble try 79 percentage held by Badoo, a substantial service, Mr. Pollock stated, “the model of Bumble just isn’t 79 % possessed by Badoo; it’s completely women-controlled.”

In the end, on March 28, Bumble filed its very own lawsuit against fit people, requiring $400 million in damages. Bumble’s discussions happen to be double — about the reports complement manufactured about trademark and register infringement are “meritless, trivial,” and comprise just leveled to create Bumble have a look terrible for other buyers.